"Sinister"
Written and Directed by Scott Derrickson
Starring Ethan Hawke, Juliet Rylance and James Ransone
Rated R
110 Minutes
Written and Directed by Scott Derrickson
Starring Ethan Hawke, Juliet Rylance and James Ransone
Rated R
110 Minutes
“Sinister” is a unique found footage movie in that it dispels
with the usual gimmick by having the main character actually find film footage in his attic. He
spends a great deal of time watching these films on a super 8 projector and
what they show is, well, sinister. The
movie as a whole is pretty creepy, assisted by the atmospheric direction of
Scott Derrickson; but “Sinister” doesn’t have a great story to tell, with a
thin narrative caught somewhere between convention and a bad case of writer’s
block.
The film actually introduces us to a writer named Ellison
Oswalt (Ethan Hawke), a true crime author that moves his family into a house
where a crime took place. Ellison keeps
this information from his wife, Tracy (Juliet Rylance), perhaps because he
knows she won’t approve. After all, they
have two children who are at that age where strange behavior is the norm, and
the last thing they would need is to be influenced by the grisly details of dad’s
research. So Tracy persists that he must
keep his office door locked at all times, and doesn’t seem to mind that he
stays up to all hours of the night, every night. He rationalizes that he hasn’t had a hit book
in ten years and this is the story
everyone will want to read. I guess he
could have worse habits; like staying up all night to play video games or
something.
Ellison soon finds a box of family home movies in the
attic. Each canister has a generic label
like “family hanging out 98’”, etc. He
figures they might help with his research and begins to watch them in his
office in the wee hours of the night.
They are family home movies, all right; they just happen to contain
footage of families meeting their end in variously brutal fashion. I shouldn’t have to tell you that the family
that used to live in Ellison’s house is included also, and the film’s opening
shot is of four of them being hung from a tree.
I also shouldn’t have to tell you that Ellison discovers, with the help
of a Deputy “So and So” (seriously) played by James Ransone, that all the
murders on the films are connected. To
deal with this, Ellison does things that don’t make sense, like drink whiskey
and ignore his family’s mental health concerns.
I might also add, that if I am a true crime author claiming that the
reason I write true crime is to expose the truth and bring justice to the
murder victims, and I have a box of murder movies that if shown to the police
would do exactly that, then I should consider calling them. But does Ellison? To be fair, the screenplay allows him a brief
moment to consider it.
The super 8 footage is undoubtedly disturbing and scary, to
the point where we are distracted from the fact that not a whole lot else is
actually happening. Oh, all the usual stuff
happens, like a floor creaking and a few things going bump in the night. But none of these events push the story
forward. When Ellison starts to notice a
mysterious figure with a freaky face in stills of all the footage, he does some
poking around only to uncover a wishy-washy mythology regarding some demon that
has no good intentions for children. To
that point, I’ll say that considering the way “Sinister” uses children in
the narrative, nobody should allow their child to watch this movie. Ever.
Trust me; the world has enough problems with misbehaving kids.
“Sinister” really isn’t a good time at all. I guess in retrospect, the sure-handed
direction and intense dread really isn’t worth what the movie has to say; which
isn’t much. Oh there are a few decent
jump scares and disturbing images that might stay with you but you can get
those in any other horror movie, can’t you?
Here’s a thought: “Sinister” has received an R rating by the MPAA but
doesn’t contain a single use of the F word or even a bit of sexual
content. This is one instance where I
stand in full support of their rating.
They clearly didn’t want kids under the age of 17 to go anywhere near
this movie. And I don’t blame them.
No comments:
Post a Comment